| |
Letter against dangerous suggestion for making “Kashmir-PoK Borders Irrelevant"
FORUM FOR SECULARISM &
DEVELOPMENT (USA)
3145 Gilbert Ave., Roseburg, OR 97471
Phone and Fax 1-541-957-841
October 11, 2008
Hon'ble Political Leaders,
Hon'ble Community and Religious Leaders, and
Hon'ble Nationalist activists:
Subject: Study by Peace
Institute suggesting to make “Kashmir-PoK Borders Irrelevant" is toxic to
National Security & dangerously misleading.
Being
overwhelmingly influenced by naivety and an inherently impulsive mindset the
Indian establishment seems once again at the verge of doing some thing extremely
dangerous and highly unthinkable, i.e. opening the Kashmir border for free
travel and trade not only with Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) but also with the
Islamic republic itself. Utilizing its usual undemocratic and non-transparent
mode of operation as a tool it has denied any role to the national Parliament,
judiciary, media and above all to the Indian public for arriving at this risk
laden, full of pitfalls decision of historic nature.
Taking such
adventurous decisions without analyzing costs and benefits, void of pragmatism
and pregnant with enormous risks and threats to the welfare of the citizenry and
the integrity of the state itself, is nothing new for the modern rulers of
India.
In the past, during the early years of
India’s
independence, they similarly invoked the mantra of “Hindi China Bhai Bhai”
signifying the great brotherly relations between
India
& China. In the ultimate context the outcome of that questionable philosophical
dogma is universally known – loss of Tibet’s independence and its occupation by
the People’s Republic of China (PRC); two Sino-Indian wars and loss of territory
and its occupation by PRC in India’s North Eastern Region; loss of territory and
its occupation by PRC in J&K’s Ladakh region. Recently even Nepal has fallen
prey to the Chinese supported Maoists rendering the north-central India
vulnerable to external penetration. But the official India, holding contempt for
real democracy and transparency, intoxicated with absolute power, refuses to
learn from its past mistakes.
1) From its
very inception, during the past sixty plus years, three full-fledged armed
confrontations and the illegal occupation of nearly half of the
J&K State,
Pakistan’s territorial, religious, demographic, economic, ideological and
political war against India has never ended.
Even today when another armed conflict is only a matter of time, the Islamic
State’s entire politics continues to be organized around anti-Indianism and
anti-Hinduism. Through its Jihad brigades and terrorists, Hindus by the
thousands are killed and bomb blasts and violent agitations have become an every
day phenomenon in the targeted country of
India.
The ethnic cleansing, illegal occupation of the properties of the dislodged
people, murder of Hindus and destruction of their religious infrastructure is a
common occurrence. The Indian Home Minister has confessed that there were
upwards of 800 terrorist cells and other such networks existing and operating in
every nook and corner of
India.
Needless to emphasize that all these outfits, which are capable of paralyzing if
not blowing up India at will, are either directly created or indirectly
supported by Islamabad. India can ignore these realities only at her own peril.
Furthermore,
has Pakistan
taken any administrative, judicial, legislative or political measures towards
normalizing the relationship with
India?
Has it defeated and outlawed any terrorist organizations? Has it abrogated the
treaty with the Taliban establishing a virtual independent state for Al Qaeda in
Waziristan? Has it defeated and captured Osama bin Laden, Ali Zachary and Mullah
Omar, the worst enemies of USA & India? Has it outlawed Al Qaeda, Taliban,
Mujahideen and other such outfits and put behind the bars their operatives? Did
it declare a new policy to vacate the aggression and occupation of Kashmir? Did
it declare Pak’s intention to disband 25, 000 Madrassas, terrorist training
camps, Jihad factories and Jihad itself as a tool for bringing about change? If
the Islamic Republic has not taken any of these measures then why should India
be foolishly so magnanimous and open her doors to welcome the members of the
Wahabi culture from the epicenter of the Islamic Jihad?
2) A few
sugar coated words uttered by Pak’s new President Mr. Zardari due to
eco-political compulsions and internal volatility prevailing in his country and
casually describing the Islamic separatists of
Kashmir as “terrorists” does not represent the change of policy by the Islamic
Republic.
Pakistan must take concrete administrative, judicial and legislative steps to
destroy the Islamic, terrorist, and anti-India culture created and perpetuated
during the past sixty years before expecting
India
to adopt an open door policy. Until then
New Delhi
must feel duty bound to strictly follow the policy of Ronald Regan towards Mr.
Gorbachev’s Russia - the policy of “trust but verify”. Anything short of that
will be foolhardy and outright dangerous for India.
New Delhi cannot ignore the
call for a “100 year war” against it and declarations to take Kashmir forcibly
given by President Zardari’s father-in-law and the former Pak-premier Z.A.
Bhutto and a similar call given by his recently assassinated wife Benazir
Bhutto. After all the new Pak President has not invented or made public any new
magic approach for normalizing his country’s relations with India? To stay in
power he has no choice but to follow the populist policies formulated by his
wife and father-in-law and those policies have always been anti-Kashmir,
anti-India and anti-Hindus.
3) When the
rest of the world including the super powers -- USA, UK, France, Germany,
Russia, China, Australia, Israel, Canada, NATO above all the United Nations are
engaged in effectively combating the Pak generated Islamic terrorists and are
taking every conceivable action to destroy them and squeeze the life out of them
how can India, whose security and territoriality are already in jeopardy, in the
name of peace and friendship open her borders and doors to facilitate their
entering and operating from her soil?
Doesn’t New
Delhi realize that as the US led NATO forces increase their attacks on Taliban &
Al Qaeda strong holds and use guided drones to blow them up both in and out side
Afghanistan and Pakistan the only logical place for these subversives is to slip
into India where they have already built self sustaining organizations and
cultivated a mass support system. Opening the border posts for traffic, without
first Pakistan having destroyed its terrorist organizations and their
infrastructure under its jurisdiction, will actually facilitate and make
considerably easier their transit into India which will in turn more seriously
threaten India’s peace, tranquility and safety of her people.
4) With intent
to legitimize the reckless yet irrational decision of New Delhi a recent study
"Making Borders Irrelevant," undertaken
by the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), New Delhi, aided and
published by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP), a research institute
based in Washington DC with Pak researchers on board, exploring the possibility
of permitting the cross-LoC trade from five crossing points in Jammu and Kashmir
(J&K), has simply ignored the history of partition, Islamic violence, separatism
and the goals of the Pan Islamic Movement in this region (Attachment A).
The conclusion
erroneously drawn by this politically motivated study supports Islamic Jihadists in
their quest for eventual Talibanization and secession of J&K. The present
truncated nature of J&K is the result of Pakistan's
unprovoked aggression and occupation despite
Kashmir’s
voluntary and enthusiastic accession to
India. The Indian part of
the state has been flourishing. If the other side has remained unattended to and
backward that is due to Pakistan’s intentional neglect and bad policies. The
unification of the state can be realized by simply removing the illegal
occupation by Pakistan.
5) In their
eagerness to draw the designated conclusion these unlettered Institutes in New
Delhi and Washington have completely ignored the Islamist crusade in Kashmir and
its links with Pan-Islamic militancy and systematic terrorist violence spread by
Pakistan and the mounting Jihadist terror attacks across India.
"Making
Borders Irrelevant"
is an idealistic objective but possible only where people of the neighborhood
believe in equitable rule of Law, respect for each others boundaries and freedom
of personal faith. There exists any thing but those characteristics in Islamic
states. The conclusions of the study drawn under a scholastic façade seem
intended to mislead the Hindus while engineering some Islamist pathways for
advancing the cause of the exclusivist Dar- ul- Islam. If Borders could be made
irrelevant or even porous why was
Yugoslavia
divided into seven tiny parts with dependable borders,
East Timor
separated from Indonesia and Pakistan and Bangladesh sliced away from India. Why
is the US fortifying its long southern border with Mexico?
In the sphere of “geopolitical world” the concept of irrelevant borders cuts at
the very roots of sovereignty and territorial integrity of states. Additionally
the inability of Islamists to coexist in peace with other religionists is well
known. With contempt and animosity they call Hindus “Kafirs” and express
hatred for their “idolatrous” ways. How can
India with a
population of 85% Hindus disregard this dangerous mindset and ideological
indoctrination of Pakistani Islamists? In fact historically it was the religious
intolerance and incompatibility of Islamists that was at the center of India’s
partition in 1947.
6) Opening more travel & trade points (transit) will
only make it easier for Jihadists to walk in and create havoc in
India.
It must be noted that after the so-called normalization process enforced by UPA
with Pakistan the infiltration of terrorists into
India
has multiplied. The Jihadists have created a formidable infrastructure in the
country giving them capacity to attack anywhere anytime. Earlier they snuck into
India through Nepal and Bangladesh but now they come by the bus, truck and train
loads direct from the Islamic republic to Hindustan. Opening more points for
trade across the line of control (LOC) without first neutralizing the culture of
Jihad, anti Hinduism and anti-Indianism in Pakistan, will blow the security
interests of India and the harmonious conduct of her civil society into the thin
air. Overlooking these interests could take India back to the days of “Hindi
Chini Bhai Bhai” thus extracting from her an excruciatingly painful cost. Are
Indians born to suffer due to the naivety of their decision makers?
7) Currently the dominant issue in Kashmir
is that of human rights violations and atrocities on Hindus and Sikhs
committed by
Islamists and the total indifference exhibited by its Muslim led Govt. – an
authority that did not allow even the use of 100 acres of land for building
temporary shelters in summer for Amarnath bound Hindu pilgrims. The idealistic
authors of the study ignore the fact that atrocities in Kashmir were actually
committed by Islamists who killed tens of thousands of Hindus and Sikhs in the
region since 1989 (over 65,000 by some estimates) and drove out more than
350,000 of them into exile, after thousands were tortured and maimed and
thousands of Hindu females were molested and forcibly converted to Islam. This
was in addition to the complete ethnic cleansing in PoK from where more than
700,000 Pandits, Dogras and Sikhs were driven by the Jihadis.
India cannot forget the
process of desecration, loot, vandalizing and destruction of Hindu temples that
took place in J&K under the anti-Hindu Islamic rule through generations. The
intent of committing these crimes was to wipe out all traces of religious and
cultural symbols of Hindus. After
Kashmir’s
accession to India
the destruction of Hinduism and its infrastructure under the new Islamic regimes
wearing secular turbans received added impetus and acceleration. Consequently
during the past two decades with the help of Al Qaeda, Taliban and Pakistan
trained terrorists hundreds of more temples were destroyed.
8) Due to stringent measures taken in the
US, not
a single terrorist act has occurred after the devastating one on the World Trade
Center in New York on
September 11,
2001.
However, by comparison there have been relentless terrorist bomb explosions
killing as many Hindus in India as Americans were in five years of war in
Iraq.
Apart from the multiple explosions in New Delhi major terrorist strikes have
taken place in Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Ayodhya, Mumbai, Varanasi, Hyderabad,
Malegaon, Panipat, Ajmer, Ludhiana, Lucknow, Faizabad, etc. killing Hindu men,
women and children by the hundreds. In these terrorists attacks nothing not even
Govt. offices, Parliament, court houses, hospitals, police, railway and bus
stations and above all Hindu temples, homes and market places were spared.
And now these
crimes take place almost every day. Thanks to the Govt. failure in preventing
the establishment of deep rooted terrorist networks, the bomb blasts in
India
with indigenous operators and materials seems to be happening regularly and the
authorities are doing precious little to stop it. Of course as usual there is no
dearth of condemnatory and bombastic statements by the people in charge blaming
others for such violent acts. The official policy of indifference towards
Hindus, who generally are the victims in these blasts, has made their blood the
cheapest and risk free in the entire world. Unlike the US and other countries
taking seriously and respecting the security and welfare of their citizens India
has miserably failed in setting up even a national security or anti-terrorism
wing for combating and uprooting this menace.
9)
Before giving any credence to the irrational
academics dogma of "Irrelevant Borders" which inescapably supports the Islamists
agenda,
India’s
painful history and experience with inhumanities inflicted by Islamists must not
be dismissed summarily.
Some of the treacherous examples of that genocidal era include:
a) killing of
50-100 million Hindus during the 700 years of Islamists rule by terror, plunder,
arson and building 98% of the Islamic population by forcible conversions;
b) wiping out more
than 20,000 people in Calcutta by Islamists in 1946 to force partition on
Congress;
c) Elimination of millions
of Sikhs & Hindus during the partition in 1947;
d) Putting to death
over three million Hindus in East Pakistan; driving out some 9 million
Bangladeshi Hindus into India; and the illegal infiltration by an additional 30
million Bangladeshi Muslims; e) Expulsion of the entire Hindu-Sikh population
from Kashmir and PoK;
f) Ethnic cleansing of
Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan where they are now less than 1% reduced from over
25% in 1947. In
Bangladesh where the non-Muslims were more than 30% in 1947 they have been
reduced to less than 8%. These one sided anti-Hindu crimes committed by
Islamists do not justify India’s unconditional change of policy towards
Pakistan
– the epicenter of Islamic terrorism, unless
India
too has a contempt for its population of which 85% is Hindu. (Foot notes 1 & 2)
10) "The jihad in
Kashmir by the
terrorists is not just for independence. Its real goal is to form a Darul Islam
with Kashmir as a part of the Caliphate.
Considering its implications upon the region and national security India cannot
allow the emergence of such a lawless and militant entity at a close proximity
to her frontiers. Therefore, the suggestion of parting with Kashmir is simply
unthinkable. The constitutions of
J&K
State and India do not provide any provisions allowing separation of any part of
the country.
Accordingly India should concentrate on doing every thing possible to maintain
it as an integral part of the country in which people of all ethnicities and
religious formations particularly the Hindus (which include Pandits, Dogras,
Buddhists & Sikhs) and Muslims can live in peace and harmony sharing power
equally in its reorganized form.
11) Hon'ble National Leaders and Activists:
These ultras have targeted the entire Indian subcontinent for Islamic
subversion. Their goal is to destroy the very fabric of
India’s
traditional society and culture. The citizens of the county must understand that
the prescribed recommendation by the irrational and
unlettered academics for making borders irrelevant has the potential of
fundamentally altering the complexion of the ground realities to the detriment
of
India. Under
the prevailing political environment when Kashmiri Muslims by the millions have
marched in city centers, villages and towns raising slogans like “we are
Pakistanis and Pakistan is ours” while carrying Pakistani flags and burning the
tri-colors, opening the doors for their possible integration with Pakistanis
will effectively lead Kashmir into the enemy Islamic camp thus irreparably
harming the country’s sovereignty and territoriality.
In such an
environment opening the gates to the Islamists and terrorists under the garb of
free travel and trade, without conditions and without first seeking a radical
political, ideological and policy transformation in Pakistan for shunning her
claim on Kashmir and for renouncing her anti-India and anti-Hindu policies,
could be tantamount to a repeat grand betrayal of mother India. Patriotic
Indians cannot and must not allow such a transformation to take place at any
cost.
Because the
Hurriyat, the multi-party conglomerate (Islamists) in
Kashmir, is an organization
that cannot go against
Pakistan,
India has a very short period of time at her disposal, as suggested by Dr.
Subramanian Swamy, to prepare for a decisive and defining war with Pakistan and
she must plan and prepare to win it to avoid the balkanization of the country.
She should, therefore, refute those Indian columnists, academicians and
politicians who are desperately desirous and are seeking being popular in
Pakistan by sounding reasonable and secular on the issue of
Kashmir.
12) "Kashmir
is our defining identity and a touchstone for our resolve to preserve our
national integrity.
The population of that state may be majority Muslim, but the land and its
history is pre-dominantly Hindu. For our commitment to the survival of the
ancient civilization of India and the composite culture that secularists talk
about, we have not only to win that coming inevitable war but also to never part
with Kashmir" (Subramanian Swamy). Furthermore,
we could not be oblivious of
Pakistan's
overwhelming expenditure on military and her obsession for a war with India.
Therefore, the cleverly designed tactical move aiding the Islamists agenda for
"irrelevant borders" through irrational and
unlettered Institutes must summarily be rejected as it will alienate
the Muslims of Kashmir and make them vulnerable for being gobbled up by the Pan
Islamic Movement. It might even trigger a domino effect and
encourage a chain of secessions leading to the
eventual disintegration of
India.
At this pivotal point in the history of modern
India
the brave people of Jammu, during the recent unprecedented struggle on
Shri
Amarnath
Land
issue, have shown the way for preventing such a thing from happening.
Dr.
Jagan Kaul
Krishan Bhatnagar
Forum for Secularism and Development (USA)
October 11, 2008
email:
krishan.kb@verizon.net
Note: This
message will soon be posted on
:
http://www.bharatjagran.com/
Footnote 1:
The Leaders
and the public must beware of the Islamists subtle moves:
"A will to
eliminate the weeds and face the wrath of malevolent elements with the
confidence of a victor is the prerequisite to be a ruler and, yes, to be a
citizen. If it's
there, you build a nation. If not, civilizations vanish. If citizens encourage
and harbour the wicked, forget dates like December 13 that should be remembered,
forget to take revenge on anti-nationals, continue with their late-night parties
when dead bodies of their fellow citizens lie splattered in busy fashion
markets, no one can save that deadwood society" (Tarun Vijay).
Footnote 2:
The single
line, "Ahimsa Paramo Dharmah" -- "Non - Violence is the greatest Dharma" in its
over - emphasis, has sapped both initiative and energy in our millions,
and, instead of
making us all irresistible moral giants, we have been reduced to poltroons and
cowards. And banking on this cowardly resignation of the majority, a handful of
fanatics have been perpetrating crimes which even the most barbarous cave
dwellers would have avenged. ..........Today when looting, arson and rape are
the dharma of a few, it is rank cowardice for the many to suffer the tyranny of
the unprovoked violence in meek submission. In the battlefield, when violence is
rampant, it is the dharma of everyone to meet that maniacal violence with
determined, restrained, violence not only in self - defence but also to convince
the aggressive vicious few that 'it rarely pays to be violent.' (Swami
Chinmayananda, Attachment B).
Attachment A
From:
Kavita Suri
Sent:
Friday, October 03, 2008 3:44 AM
Subject:VERY
IMPORTANT IPCS PRESS RELEASE
|
VERY IMPORTANT IPCS
PRESS RELEASE
"Permit cross-LoC trade
from five crossing points in J&K", suggests a joint Indo-Pak study
NEW DELHI, OCT 03: While India and Pakistan are all set to start cross-LoC
trade from Uri-Muzaffarabad and Poonch-Rawalakote roads from October 21
later this month, a recent study supported by a US-based research institute
has suggested exploring the possibility of permitting the cross-LoC trade
from five crossing points in Jammu and Kashmir which were opened for
earthquake relief when a massive quake had hit the region in 2005.
“The possibility of border trade being permitted at the five crossing points
opened for earthquake relief is worth exploring for the convenience of
people living on both sides of the LOC,” recommends the research study
entitled, "Making Borders Irrelevant," undertaken by the Institute of Peace
and Conflict Studies (IPCS), New Delhi, supported and published by the
United States Institute of Peace (USIP), a research institute based in
Washington DC.
Making an interesting observation for "border trade", which is different
from normal bilateral trade, the study says that the roads that lead to
these crossing points could be upgraded to permit truck traffic, assuming
that such traffic is found to be commercially viable and official fears
about smuggling can be overcome.
Besides looking into the traditional export route for timber from the Valley
before partition, which was through the Jhelum river, which flows into
Pakistan, the study also asks to explore the possibilities of riverine
transportation, as Cross-LoC cooperation in this area might prove
productive, though the river would need considerable de-silting before it
could once again carry significant traffic.
Undertaken by two leading scholars from India and Pakistan - PR Chari, a
Research Professor at the IPCS, a leading think tank in New Delhi and Hasan
Askari Rizvi, a leading defence expert from Pakistan who is now a visiting a
Professor in Washington DC, this study is supported by two parallel surveys
carried out by Suba Chandran and Rashid Khan, on both sides of the Line of
Control.
Calling for re-opening of pilgrimage routes on all parts of J&K, including
Ladakh and Northern Areas, the study also suggests the "the establishment of
rail links between Jammu and Sialkot, and between Srinagar and Muzaffarabad
(and from there onward to Abbotabad and Rawalpindi)."
Regarding cross-LoC travels, it asks the governments of India and Pakistan
to expand the eligibility criteria to include other categories of travelers
such as tourists, persons requiring medical treatment, traders, and even
dissident political leaders. Besides, it says that there is also a need to
simplify permit procedure, through shortening the process of obtaining
travel documentation.
Chari and Rizvi make recommendations under four broad categories: promoting
people-to-people contact; increasing trade and commerce across the LoC;
encouraging humanitarian aid and development; and improving governance,
including security administration.
The study provides specific recommendations under each of the above four
categories. Under promoting people to people contacts between the two parts
of J&K, the study concludes, "the roads do not presently carry enough
traffic to make commercial bus services viable, but their opening would
allow people to move across the LOC by private transport and might
eventually generate enough traffic to permit commercial bus services."
The study is based on the premise that "neither India nor Pakistan has been
able to impose its preferred solution on the long-standing Kashmir conflict,
and both sides have gradually shown more flexibility in their traditional
positions on Kashmir, without officially abandoning them. This development
has encouraged the consideration of new, creative approaches to the
management of the conflict."
The study also recommends a multi-campus university straddling the LoC.
According to
Chari and Rizvi,
"two campuses could be situated in Muzaffarabad and
Srinagar, with other
campuses established subsequently in other cities on both sides of the LOC.
This would facilitate the exchange of teachers and students."
This report also calls for the restoration of telephone landlines that were
cut in 1965, besides asking for an expansion of mobile telephone services
across the LoC. Even today, people in J&K are not allowed to make direct
telephone calls across the LoC. According to the authors of the study, "this
prohibition makes little sense, for calls can of course be made via mobile
phones and satellite-linked communications."
Besides, the study also calls for enhanced access to the Internet on both
sides of the LOC, as it "would greatly stimulate contact between people on
both sides of the border, allowing them to exchange e-mail, post and respond
to blogs, and stay abreast of developing news stories." More importantly,
internet access would also allow journalists for electronic and print media
to develop closer cross-border contacts with one another. Also, television
programs broadcast from one side of the LOC can usually be watched on the
other side, and some attract large audiences, reflecting the common culture
of the people on both sides of the LOC.
The study also considers sharing of information between both parts of J&K on
weather conditions, seismic activity, and flow of water in rivers, which
will help to generate early warnings of floods and other natural disasters.
Such cooperation, the report says, could evolve into a long-term process of
monitoring and researching the retreat of glaciers, the incidence of
earthquakes, and other environmental concerns.
The study says, "No steps, whether short term or long term, can be taken
until the tensions between India and Pakistan erode. This will not happen
suddenly. The reality is that India-Pakistan relations cannot be
dramatically improved over the short run, nor can all their outstanding
problems be resolved quickly. Unrealistic expectations that progress in
making borders irrelevant in
Kashmir
will be swift and that India-Pakistan relations will rapidly improve could
lead to frustrations. Moreover, the task of making borders irrelevant in
Kashmir cannot be considered in isolation from ongoing efforts to do the
same thing elsewhere along the international border between India and
Pakistan."
"As all sides are coming to recognize, the present borders cannot be
changed, but they can be made more porous, and a larger measure of
self-governance devolved" to both J&K and PoK,” the study concludes.
-----
For any further information, please contact Dr. D. Suba Chandran, Deputy
Director, IPCS, subachandran@gmail.com,
91-11-4100-1900 (O) & 93126-80858 (M)
KAVITA SURI
Ph.D
Associate Professor/Assistant Director
Centre for Adult,
Continuing Education & Extension (CACE&E)
University of
Jammu,
Jammu, J&K, India
www.jammuuniversity.in/academics_aeducation.asp
Columnist
The Statesman, J&K,
India
Editor-in-Chief
Kashmir Perspective
A weekly print & an
online daily newspaper of J&K
www.kashmirperspective.org |
Attachment B
http://www.chinmaya.org.nz/Articles/Swami%20Chinmayananda/11.htm
DHARMA HIMSA TATHAIVA CA
by Swami
Chinmayananda
Personally, I am no
advocate of violence. But violence, too, has its rightful place in life, life
does not preclude death. The average Indian has been moulded into a particular
national mentality of quixotic tolerance. His attitude is shaped into its
distinct pattern by the ideologies and moralities preached in our national
literature. And no single work in our classics has gained such a wide influence
on our people as the Bhagawad Gita: and in, this century, no other single
message had such a universal appeal to our countrymen as the single line,
"Ahimsa Paramo Dharmah" -- "Non - Violence is the greatest Dharma."
This line in its over -
emphasis, has sapped both initiative and energy in our millions, and, instead of
making us all irresistible moral giants, we have been reduced to poltroons and
cowards. And banking on this cowardly resignation of the majority, a handful of
fanatics have been perpetrating crimes which even the most barbarous cave
dwellers would have avenged. To clothe our weaknesses, we attribute to them
glorious names and purposefully persuade ourselves to believe that they are
brilliant ideologists !
Let us for a moment go to
the original sacred verse and investigate the significances of the moral
precept: Ahimsa Paramo Dharmah. This is the opening line of a stanza, and the
very next line reads: Dharma himsaa tathaiva cha. "So too is all righteous
violence." Indeed, non - violence is the supreme policy to be adopted by man to
foster enduring peace in the world; but there are certain dire moments in the
life of individuals, as of nations, when we will have to meet force with force
in order that justice be done.
To every individual his
mother, wife and children are the nearest dependents and to guard their honour
and life is the unavoidable first moral duty of each head of the family. This is
an obligation whether the victim be a member of the majority or of the minority
class within a country, province or city.
By the over - emphasis laid
on non - violence we have come to witness the pathetic situation of today, when
thousands, in cowardly fear take to precipitate flight, leaving their innocent
children to be butchered and their unarmed helpless women to be dishonoured or
converted or killed. Under the cloak of glorified non - violence, an entire
nation of cowards fly from their homes, when a small sect of fanatic barbarians
boldly stalk in and out of their open undefended thresholds to kill, to rape,
and to loot. When will we learn to fully interpret our Vedas, scriptures and
Upanishads. If only we all learn that dharma - himsa is equally noble as ahimsa.
To me it seems that the
only solution for the day's internal chaos is to bring home to the people the
significance of the much neglected teaching of dharma - himsa. As it is, a
misled and over - excited minority in the country has the sole monopoly of
violence; and non - violence is a dangerous folly. However ideal a moral precept
may be, so long as, in a society, innocent children, helpless women and
defenceless old are left to be butchered dishonoured and tortured, while the
youth of the land is made to watch impassionately the hellish scene, we are to
conclude that either the idea is a dangerous one, or that we have not rightly
understood the full meaning of the precept.
Under the present available
scheme of chaos in this country, when under the planned instigation of a few
power blind, reckless men, a minority community is rendered into a murderous
gang of fanatics, it is the duty of the majority to win back the erring
thousands. The cure depends upon the disease; the potency of the medicine is
decided upon the virulence of the illness. Today when looting, arson and rape
are the dharma of a few, it is rank cowardice for the many to suffer the tyranny
of the unprovoked violence in meek submission. In the battlefield, when violence
is rampant, it is the dharma of everyone to meet that maniacal violence with
determined, restrained, violence not only in self - defence but also to convince
the aggressive vicious few that 'it rarely pays to be violent.'
|
|